Our research

Nothing here is opinion.

Every pattern Esen notices is anchored in published, peer-reviewed research on how good leaders actually lead. No proprietary frameworks. Nothing invented. You can read the sources yourself.

Our stance
We use the research to see — not to show off.

All four behavioural dimensions are anchored in publicly available, citable research. No proprietary frameworks are licensed or reproduced.

The foundations

Five bodies of work

The reading behind the coaching. Each one earns its place by being observable in a real meeting — and publicly citable.

01

Psychological Safety

Amy C. EdmondsonThe Fearless OrganizationHarvard Business School Press · 2018
Google re:WorkProject AristotlePublicly published · 2016

The belief that you can speak up without fear of punishment is the single strongest predictor of team effectiveness. When it’s present, people raise problems early, admit what they don’t know, and challenge the room. When it’s missing, they go quiet.

What Esen watches for
  • How you respond to a dissenting opinion
  • Whether you acknowledge uncertainty or your own mistakes
  • Whether quieter voices get invited in
  • Whether challenge is met without defensiveness
In-product citation

Based on Amy Edmondson’s psychological safety research (Harvard Business School) and Google’s Project Aristotle findings on team effectiveness.

02

Humble Inquiry

Edgar H. ScheinHumble Inquiry: The Gentle Art of Asking Instead of TellingBerrett-Koehler · 2013

Schein draws a line between telling and asking as fundamental leadership behaviours. The strongest leaders ask more than they tell — and the questions they ask open things up rather than steer to a foregone answer.

What Esen watches for
  • Your ratio of questions to directives
  • Whether questions are genuinely exploratory or rhetorical
  • Whether you build on an answer or redirect back to your framing
In-product citation

Analyzes question vs. directive patterns based on Edgar Schein’s Humble Inquiry framework (MIT Sloan).

03

Team Dynamics & Equal Voice

Google re:WorkProject AristotlePublicly published · 2016
Anita Woolley et al.A Collective Intelligence Factor in Human GroupsScience, 330(6004) · 2010

A team’s collective intelligence is predicted less by individual IQ than by two things: roughly equal participation, and social sensitivity to one another. A meeting where one voice dominates leaves intelligence on the table.

What Esen watches for
  • How speaking time is distributed across the room
  • Whether you create space or fill it
  • Active-listening signals in how you respond
In-product citation

Drawing on Google’s Project Aristotle research and Woolley et al.’s collective intelligence findings (Science, 2010).

04

Emotional Intelligence

Daniel GolemanEmotional IntelligenceBantam · 1995
Daniel GolemanPrimal LeadershipHarvard Business Review Press · 2002

We reference Goleman’s conceptual framework only — self-awareness, empathy, social awareness, self-regulation — as a lens for what shows up in language. We never administer or replicate any proprietary EQ assessment.

What Esen watches for
  • Self-awareness — naming your own reactions and limits
  • Empathy — naming what others are seeing
  • Reading the room and adjusting tone
  • How your language holds up under pressure
In-product citation

Informed by Daniel Goleman’s emotional intelligence framework. Note: we do not administer or replicate any proprietary EQ assessment.

05

AI-Era & Generational Context

DeloitteGlobal Gen Z & Millennial SurveyAnnual · publicly published
Pew Research CenterWorkforce reportsPublicly published
MIT Sloan Management ReviewHuman + AI teamingPublicly available
GallupState of the Global WorkplaceAnnual · publicly published

A living context layer, not a fixed score. Younger teams respond to leaders who explain the why, invite input over issuing directives, make safety explicit, and acknowledge uncertainty — especially about AI. This keeps the coaching modern and relevant, not a rehash of 1990s leadership theory.

Why it matters
  • Today’s rooms span more generations than ever
  • Authentic uncertainty about AI reads as strength, not weakness
  • The same behaviour can land differently across a team
From research to practice

What Esen actually notices

The five foundations resolve into four things Esen can observe from a transcript alone — no audio, no sentiment guessing.

Dimension
Research anchor
What’s observed
Space Creation
Edmondson · Project Aristotle
Talk-time ratio, inviting input, responding to quieter voices
Humble Inquiry
Schein
Questions vs. directives, and the quality of the questions
Idea Amplification
Project Aristotle · Goleman
Building on others’ ideas, crediting contributions
Clarity of Intent
Drucker · Gallup
Decision clarity, named ownership, clear next steps
Where we draw the line

What we dont do

No proprietary frameworks

Nothing licensed, nothing reproduced. Every dimension rests on publicly available, citable work you can read yourself.

No EQ scoring

We use Goleman’s concepts as a lens — never any proprietary assessment, and never a number on your emotional intelligence.

No theory thrown at you

Esen uses the research to see, then speaks plainly. It names a framework only when knowing it genuinely helps you.

The shelf · selected references
  • Edmondson, A. C. (2018). The Fearless Organization. Harvard Business School Press.
  • Schein, E. H. (2013). Humble Inquiry. Berrett-Koehler.
  • Google re:Work. (2016). Project Aristotle: Understanding Team Effectiveness. Publicly available.
  • Woolley, A. W. et al. (2010). A Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups. Science, 330(6004), 686–688.
  • Goleman, D. (1995; 2002). Emotional Intelligence; Primal Leadership. Bantam; HBR Press.
  • Deloitte; Pew; MIT Sloan; Gallup. Generational & human–AI workforce research. Annual, publicly published.

Honest feedback,
with the receipts.

Start free